Stewardship of Self and Team; Hybrid Working
Is Collaboration Better Face to Face? The Evidence, the Nuance, and What Leaders Need to Know
Every few months the debate resurfaces: is face-to-face collaboration better than virtual?
The truth is more nuanced - and more important - than a simple yes or no.
The right question isn’t “Is it better?”
It’s: “For which tasks does physical presence create an advantage?”
The evidence is now strong, and surprisingly consistent across disciplines: some forms of collaboration are significantly more effective in person, while others are equally strong – sometimes stronger – online. The skill of modern leadership is knowing the difference and designing work accordingly.
What Face-to-Face Collaboration Does Better
1. More ideas, more creativity, more shared sense-making
A Stanford Graduate School of Business study found virtual meetings tend to “generate fewer ideas” than in-person sessions, particularly when creativity or shared exploration is required.
Other workplace research shows similar patterns: in-person collaboration produces 15–20% more ideas and increases engagement and energy.
Face-to-face helps teams think together.
That’s hard to replicate through a screen.
2. Trust builds faster and deeper in the same room
The CIPD’s evidence review concluded that trust is foundational for team performance – and significantly harder to build in virtual settings. It found that virtual teams with high trust outperform low-trust teams, but building that trust online requires far more deliberate effort, clarity and articulation.
In-person interactions make trust formation easier because humans rely on tone, micro-signals, gestures and reassurance for psychological safety.
3. Informal interactions matter more than leaders think
Workplace analytics platforms note that in-person settings preserve the ad-hoc interactions that drive collaboration: the two-minute clarification, the decompression after a tough meeting, the “while I’m here…” conversations. These interactions improve rapport and reduce friction in complex work.
Decades of research - from the original Allen Curve to today’s hybrid-work studies - show the same thing: physical proximity makes spontaneous collaboration far more likely. Distance doesn’t make it impossible, but it makes it rarer and more effortful.
But Remote Collaboration Excels for Execution
Remote collaboration isn’t inherently worse. In many contexts it outperforms in-person working.
A University of Oxford-linked study reported that long-distance scientific teams were more likely to produce breakthrough ideas than teams based in the same location. Remote set-ups widened networks, reduced groupthink and increased diversity of thinking.
Remote collaboration also supports:
focused deep work
reduced travel and cost
more equitable access to talent
asynchronous progress
Remote work works.
The risk is mis-matching the medium to the moment.
The Leadership Lesson: Match the Method to the Task
Use face-to-face for:
trust-building
alignment
complex or ambiguous problem-solving
early-stage collaboration
resolving conflict
high-stakes decisions
cross-department or cross-sector work
Use remote for:
delivery
planning
updates
documentation
deep individual work
cost-efficient coordination
This is not nostalgia for the office.
It’s about making conscious choices based on how humans actually collaborate.
Why This Matters for Leaders, Transformation and Culture
If you’re leading change, transformation or cross-functional work, the evidence points to one strategic conclusion:
Bring people together at the moments that matter most.
This often means:
an in-person kick-off
a mid-point alignment and sense-check
a reset when relationships or clarity have drifted
periodic deep-work gatherings for complex or systemic issues
It does not mean bringing people in just to “be seen”.
It means using physical presence sparingly and purposefully to unlock higher-quality thinking, trust and alignment that would take far longer – or never emerge – online.
The Hidden Cost: What This COULD looks Like in a 100-Person Organisation
If you run a 100-person organisation, even small mismatches between task and mode compound quickly. Imagine each person spends just one hour a week in a meeting that would have been far more effective face-to-face (or conversely, one hour on-site that could have been done remotely). That’s 100 hours of misallocated effort every week - the equivalent of over two full-time roles lost. Stretch that out over a year and you’re looking at more than 5,000 hours of diluted thinking, slower alignment and friction in delivery. And this doesn’t count the “second-order costs”: delayed decisions, rework, miscommunication, weakened trust and the cultural fatigue that follows. When leaders get the mode wrong, organisations pay for it twice: first in time, then in quality. When they get it right, the collective ripple effect is exponential.
So, is collaboration better face to face?
For creativity, trust-building, complexity and culture – yes.
For delivery and deep focus – not necessarily.
The strongest organisations aren’t choosing a side.
They’re choosing the right mode for the right moment.
Remember that we must think about personal preference too and how we honour that, whilst being aware of the evidence.
Leaders who understand that distinction get better decisions, faster alignment, stronger culture and more resilient teams.
A Question
It’s a balance. But there is a set of questions which are worthwholke reflecting upon:
Are you working in the right place?
At the right time?
With the right people?
And on the right stuff?
Get in touch if you or your team would like to work through this.
Stefan
Executive Coach | Founder of Be the Waves
Helping good people lead great things
Enjoyed reading this? Consider doing one of these:
Get in touch - If any of this topic resonated with you and you have something you’d like to share with me or if you’d like to discuss working with me on this topic - stefan@stefanpowell.co.uk works really well for me.
Connect with me on linked in and read my long form posts on the rotating topics of Work, Rest. Play, Sustenance and Love every Thursday
Sign up to my newsletter ‘Be The Waves” here - which collates each weeks long form post on a monthly basis and you’ll get to read it later in the month
I’ll continue this in 4 to 5 Thursdays time when I continue the topic of ‘Rest” in my Thursday Journal.
Book an inquisitive session with me to find out more about what I do and how I do it or run a challenge or thought you have passed me.
For now; thank you
I am…
An executive coach who specialises in helping good people lead great things.
Good people care about others, our planet and beauty. Great things are changes for the betterment of society and all that lives within an around it.
It sounds big and fun - it is.
I'm also an endurance racing cyclist and a go. getter.
You can read more about me and what I do; how I work here